Officially, I’m taking a break from reading for the Hugo Awards this year. I’ve found participating in the Hugo process as a reader and voter wonderfully rewarding, not least because it has introduced me to authors I would have completely missed otherwise, but I’m also a conscientious voter, and that means I try to read enough of each work in the categories I vote in to give it a fair shake. That adds up to a significant share of my annual reading page — I am not one of the people who can read upwards of 200 books a year — and this year I felt it would be more of a chore than a joy. I chose to take a year off even before the finalists were announced, so it’s no reflection on the finalists. In fact, the publishers may come out ahead on me this year, since there are several finalists I want to read and will obviously not be receiving in the Hugo reader’s packet.
But then I read Doreen’s post, and I thought that looking in on one category, with manageable reading, would be a fun thing to do even in an off year. In theory, I like formal experiments — yay! stretch what it is that a story can do, push limits on what’s considered a story — but I am coming to realize that I almost never like an experiment better than a really well-told narrative. This year’s short story finalists had four experimental stories, and it’s not surprising that I preferred the two narratives. Here are some short thoughts on each, in ascending order of my preference.
“Five Views of the Planet Tartarus” by Rachael K. Jones offers a bare-bones account of horrific punishment in a spacefaring society that can afford the resources to mete out eternal orbital confinement as the penalty for treason. The story pulls names from Greek mythology — Tartarus, of course, and also a Sibylline Court — but the setting and society are not even sketched, just gestured toward. Speaking of Sibyls, the story is more of a dream or a vision than a tale. Jones says so with the story’s title, so a reader should not expect anything else. I found the work more of an evocation of elements that I already knew; I don’t know if the set-up could support a story rather than a set of views, but in any event that’s not what Jones chose to write. It’s a horrific vision with a kick at the end, but there isn’t anything else.









