The 2026 Hugo Award for Best Related Work — which isn’t called the Hugo Award for Everything Else but at this stage in its evolution maybe should be — hews closer to its bookish roots this time around. Four of six finalists are books, or at least very book-like, with a podcast and a spreadsheet rounding out the list. This inverts the 2025 shares, which had two books, three reports in various formats and a Bingo Reading Challenge.
I expect the back and forth to continue, as it speaks to a fundamental tension in the category: Will the non-fiction books for which the category was originally created get crowded out by more topical, more controversial and more glancingly engageable works? Hugo nominators and voters are having a multi-year conversation about what they, we, consider deserving of the field’s top honors. Inevitably, there will be proposals to split the category into book and non-book categories. Unless books somehow wind up getting crowded out year after year, I hope that the present inelegant compromise will be maintained. Category proliferation is a one-way ratchet, and as much as I have rolled my eyes at some nominations (and ranked them below No Award), establishing Best Related Non-Book Work would likely be the source of much more.
This year seems to have struck a good balance, though my views will become obvious as I make a few notes about each finalist in ascending order of preference.
“Ragnarök vs the Long Night” is an episode of the History of Westeros Podcast, released in August 2025. I presume that the whole project is close enough to a professional podcast that it was ineligible in the Fancast category. The episode concerns connections between apocalypses, especially from Nordic mythology, and “The Long Night,” the third episode of the final season of Game of Thrones, originally broadcast in May 2019, and the first episode that I didn’t watch. The production of the podcast, which I encountered as a YouTube video, is high quality, and obviously a labor of love. It’s also two and a half hours long about a show I had fallen out of love with and stopped watching at precisely the episode the hosts discuss in great detail. There’s obviously an appreciative audience for this sort of thing. I’m just not part of it.









